The Oxford Guide - Differences between Version 12 and Version 11 of Janetmck/Notes

Version 12	Version 11
== Line 24 ==	== Line 24 ==
* Do reviews like [[Oxford Retreat\|this]] really need splitting up into individual entries & attributing to their authors? -- [[Kake]] says: "I don't think so! Just get rid of all that stuff and make the link to Daily Info into an explicit one."	* Do reviews like [[Oxford_Retreat\|this]] really need splitting up into individual entries & attributing to their authors?
== Line 39 ==	== Line 39 ==
host='2001:8b0:ca94:869f:226:8ff:fef9:453d'	host='78.105.231.65'

To Fix

Ginos:
- name should have an apostrophe
- reviews need hiving off into user pages
Noodle Nation doesn't seem to have a revision history so I can't figure out whose the review is
[http://oxford.openguides.org/wiki/?Caff%E9_Nero]:
- need separate pages for branches - I have done
- name should be Caffè Nero (grave, not acute accent on the 'e')
- Cafe Nero comes up in search but node doesn't exist?
- how the heck do I link to the existing page as an internal wiki link? Neither é, é, nor %E9 works.
Combibo's Coffee shouldn't have an apostrophe in
G&Ds is hard to search for! How can we fix this? Also, they should have their real names somewhere, ie:
- George & Davis - G And Ds (Little Clarendon Street)
- George & Danver - G And Ds (St Aldate's)
- George & Delila - G And Ds (Cowley Road)
Waterstone's should no longer have an apostrophe (they ditched it last year)

'Internet Access' v 'Internet Cafes' v 'Free Wifi' - subsets, supersets, orthogonal...?
'Oriental Food' - remove?
Locale 'Central' - superset?
Are things like Goths and Gay within the scope of the openguide?
Do reviews like this really need splitting up into individual entries & attributing to their authors?

Broom Tree Café (Ark T Centre) open Mon-Fri 10am-3pm, Ark T Centre, Crowell Rd, Cowley, Oxford OX4 3LN Tel: 396 778